User talk:Hosokawa

Test Edit

Final results	Contestant
Miss City Universe 2011	Los Angeles – Alyssa Campanella
1st runner-up	Gold Coast – Jesinta Campbell
2nd runner-up	Honolulu – Angela Byrd
3rd runner-up	Yogyakarta – Reisa Kartikasari
4th runner-up	Gorontalo – Alessandra Usman
Top 10	Guadalajara – Ximena Navarrete Jakarta – Zivanna Letisha Siregar Kuala Lumpur – Deborah Priya Henry Pristina – Afërdita Dreshaj Bicol – Shamcey Supsup
Top 15	Miami – Lissette Garcia New Delhi – Puja Gupta New York - Amber Collins Brisbane – Joanna Leskiewicz Palembang – Ayu Nitria

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for attempting to harass other users. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Amalthea 12:27, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To elaborate: A block was placed on this account due to your inappropriate use of multiple accounts (WP:ILLEGIT) and your gross personal attacks made against another editor (WP:NPA).
If you desire to be unblocked, I expect two things from you: 1) a strict adherence to the community's norms and policies in the future. 2) an apology to the editor in question.
If you instead opt to avoid this block and continue to edit with other accounts or anonymously, I am going to seek a site ban for you, which means that all your edits will be summarily reverted.
Amalthea 12:44, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I don't really understand whole the words that you used, because I'm Indonesian and I'm still 14 years old, I don't really understand much about the wikipedia, can you show me the two things that you expected for me how to do it ?

I want your promise that you will only edit with this account in the future. Do not log out to make edits. Do not use another account. (WP:SOCK)
I want you to be civil and collaborative. Do not attack other editors. Work with them, not against them. Our goal here is to build an encyclopedia. We can only do so if we work together, and follow the rules the community has set up. ((WP:5, WP:CIVIL, WP:NPA)
I want you to apologize to User:Arielle Leira for all the insults and abusive comments you left at her talk page.

If you can comply with this, I will reduce this block to two weeks. If you want someone else to handle this, you can use the {{unblock}} template as described above. Amalthea 13:00, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I promise I won't attack another editors anymore, and I won't used my another accounts to edit. But, how do I apology to Arielle Leira ? Because you blocked me, and I can't apology on her talk page anymore..... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hosokawa (talk • contribs) 13:10, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You can either do so here and I'll point it out to Arielle Leira, or you can do so once your block expires. Amalthea 14:20, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks.

Dear Arielle Leira:

I'm very sorry because I sent a lot of rude words and sentences to your talk page, very very sorry. I hope we can make peace, and I'm very sorry about what I've done to your talk page...... I promise I won't make the same things that I've done to you before, sorry for bothering you.....

From: Hosokawa

Alright. As you may have seen, I've shortened the block to two weeks. Please resolve editing disputes through constructive talk page discussions instead in the future. Amalthea 16:21, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Umm....Sorry, but could you please to make your sentences easier to understand, because I'm not really good at English, and there were some words that I haven't know just because some of them hasn't taught yet in my school, sorry for bothering you.....

Anyway, I'm not a boy or men, actually I'm a girl, because I saw you wrote on Arielle Leira's talk page calling me "his". :D

Sorry about that.
What I meant to say: We all want this encyclopedia to be as good and useful as possible. If you have disagreements with other editors, discuss the problems on the article talk page next time. If they have concerns with your edits, work it out with them. They are not attacking you, they only want to make this encyclopedia better. If you are friendly and willing to find an agreement, other editors will be nice and helpful to you as well. Amalthea 17:42, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, okay I understand what do you mean, actually I don't have any disagreement with the other editors, so I think it would not be a problem anymore, but I just don't want my edit in Miss Asia Pacific World 2011 removed by someone else without any reasons, I think only that, thanks for your nice explanation. Oh, may I ask you for a help ? Please edit the Miss Asia Pacific World 2011 delegates roster, because some of them were deleted from the MAPW 2011 official website, you can see in here http://www.missasiapacific.tv/main/0303_eng.html?PHPSESSID=a08978415765312f5b85e5b2482775a7, so you could know which delegate was deleted, and you can edit the delegates roster to remove the delegates from the delegates roster, sorry for my bad English, thanks.

Talkback

Hello, Hosokawa. You have new messages at Amalthea's talk page.
Message added 10:08, 6 July 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Amalthea 10:08, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Tsokye Tsomo Karchung in Miss Earth 2008.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Tsokye Tsomo Karchung in Miss Earth 2008.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 05:10, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Miss Asia Pacific World 2011

Hello, Hosokawa. You have new messages at JRheic's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

License tagging for File:China America flag.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:China America flag.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:08, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but I think I don't have to put any copyright tag of the image, because I had created my own flag in wikipedia common for the China America's flag. You can delete that image, thanks. One more thing, could you please ask a user called "Amalthea" to see this page ? Thanks you Hosokawa (talk) 18:28, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for attempting to harass other users. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Amalthea 17:48, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hosokawa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Amalthea, I'm very sorry that I left abusive comments at Arielle Leira's talk page. Well, I was in a bad condition today, so when I saw her comments in Jhereic's talk page, its make felt angry to her. That's why I sent abusive comments to her talk page. But after I sent it, I realize I just do something wrong, and then I quickly deleted it before someone see it. I'm very sorry about this, please unblock me and give me one more chance. If I still do the same thing, you can block me forever in wikipedia. One more thing, I'm telling you the TRUTH, not a LIE. I swear I won't do the same mistake anymore, please unblock me, give me one more chance, okay ? Hosokawa (talk) 18:27, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You've already been given a second chance, and blew it most spectacularly. I see no reason why allowing you to edit again would benefit the project, and the begging that was here just a few moments ago and the multiple edit conflicts I've had in trying to post this do not help in the slightest. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 18:38, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hosokawa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Well, okay then. But could you give me one more chance, please ? For sure, I love wikipedia, I love editing page, and one more thing, I have to take care of my page Miss Asia Pacific World 2011. I hope you understand my feeling. Sorry I bother you all. Sorry for all the administrators in here. Sorry if bothering you guys. I understand that attacking another editor is WRONG. I know what should I do, I swear I won't do the second time. Hosokawa (talk) 18:45, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

"Take care of my page" - I think that shows your problem in full - no one owns any page on Wikipedia, and no one has any right to ensure a page progresses in a certain way. When you make every edit you agree to the text If you do not want your writing to be edited, used, and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here. Pages here are constructed by consensus by all editors who are treated equally - harassing users is just trying to force your opinions. I see no reason to unblock at this time Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:04, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You mean a third time. :-/ Also, there are other editors, and no page is specifically yours, so I'm sure that article will be just fine without you. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 19:18, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hosokawa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm very sorry about what I've done. Please accept my reason and unblock me. I know attacking another user is wrong, but the person who block me is misunderstanding me. After I sent the abusive comments to Arielle Leira's talk page, and then I delete it immediately, right ? Just because I forgot to apologize to her, I was blocked. Please check Arielle Leira's talk page, I swear I deleted it after I sent the abusive comments to her talk page. Hosokawa (talk) 03:11, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have already proven that you cannot be trusted with another chance. Amalthea gave you an opportunity to show your usefulness to this project and you threw it back in his face. Unblock declined. Eagles 24/7 (C) 06:41, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hosokawa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If you think I will attack Arielle Leira, then ask her to protect her talk page, so I won't be able to write on her talk page. I don't have any mean threatening to attack her, because no user in here believe that I won't attack her anymore. One more thing, please unblock me and give me the last chance. If I couldn't do what you want, you can block me forever in wikipedia. Hosokawa (talk) 07:18, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

There are many conditions to WP:OFFER, all of which would need to be met. Perhaps you will mature enough to understand that attacks are never acceptable, even if you apologize. There are many people watching articles, so I am sure they'll be fine - the worst thing you could do would be to try to edit them anonymously or by creating a new userid, as that would violate WP:OFFER (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:34, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Are you basically threatening to attack her again, by suggesting that we protect her page so that you can't? You really must be still a child. –MuZemike 07:27, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I mean if you guys still think I will attack her, then ask her to protect her talk page. Because no user in here believe that I will hold my promise to not to attack her. I don't have any mean threatening to attack her, because no user in here believe me that I won't attack her.

I'm not a child, but I'm a 14 years old teenager. Hosokawa (talk) 07:30, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As I see it, nobody is at this point willing to unblock this account, and if you continue with unblock requests, very soon this talk page will be the one that is protected.
I would recommend that you read the WP:Standard offer:

Wait six months (without sockpuppeting).
Don't create any extraordinary reasons to object to a return.
After six months, ask for an unblock, and promise to avoid the behavior that led to the block.

Amalthea 07:41, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miss Tourism International country rankings for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Tourism International country rankings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Tourism International country rankings until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 13:12, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miss International country rankings for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss International country rankings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss International country rankings until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 22:14, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miss Earth country rankings for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Earth country rankings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Earth country rankings until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 13:47, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miss World country rankings for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss World country rankings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss World country rankings until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 21:53, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mister International country rankings for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mister International country rankings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mister International country rankings until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 04:12, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miss Asia Pacific International country rankings for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Asia Pacific International country rankings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Asia Pacific International country rankings until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 11:58, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miss Asia Pacific 1988 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Asia Pacific 1988 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Asia Pacific 1988 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 11:50, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miss Asia Pacific 1986 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Asia Pacific 1986 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Asia Pacific 1986 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 11:50, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miss Asia Pacific 1984 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Asia Pacific 1984 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Asia Pacific 1984 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 11:50, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miss Asia Pacific 1983 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Asia Pacific 1983 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Asia Pacific 1983 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 11:51, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miss Asia Pacific 1982 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Asia Pacific 1982 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Asia Pacific 1982 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 11:51, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miss Asia Pacific 1980 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Asia Pacific 1980 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Asia Pacific 1980 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 11:51, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miss Asia Pacific 1981 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Asia Pacific 1981 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Asia Pacific 1981 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 11:52, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miss Asia Pacific 1969 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Asia Pacific 1969 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Asia Pacific 1969 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 15:03, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miss Asia Pacific 1979 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Asia Pacific 1979 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Asia Pacific 1979 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 13:02, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miss Asia Pacific 1978 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Asia Pacific 1978 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Asia Pacific 1978 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 13:03, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miss Asia Pacific 1976 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Asia Pacific 1976 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Asia Pacific 1976 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 13:03, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miss Asia Pacific 1975 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Asia Pacific 1975 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Asia Pacific 1975 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 13:03, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miss Asia Pacific 1968 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Asia Pacific 1968 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Asia Pacific 1968 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 15:39, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miss Asia Pacific 1974 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Asia Pacific 1974 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Asia Pacific 1974 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 06:57, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miss Asia Pacific 1973 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Asia Pacific 1973 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Asia Pacific 1973 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 06:57, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miss Asia Pacific 1972 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Asia Pacific 1972 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Asia Pacific 1972 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 06:57, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miss Asia Pacific 1971 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Asia Pacific 1971 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Asia Pacific 1971 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 06:58, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]